Day 3 of the Writing Project….I believe I had another
revelation. Before I begin, by default, I have put myself into a habit of showing the Agenda...so here it is:
Nice to meet your Michael! |
After I found my group of authors, with familiar names like
Nicholas Sparks (why couldn't I get that one?), we began on our assignment. We
had to determine the "rules" of writing (I'm going to address this on
my soap box a little later) and determine our Top Five Rules for "Good
Writing." This took us awhile (so long that poor Kendra came by to warn us
that the other groups were ahead of us and we may not finish). We finally
decided that our "TOP FIVE" rules were:
1. Mechanics (Spelling, punctuation, etc.)
2. Flow & Organization (Logical progression, everything is in the "right" spot, etc.)
3. Captivating & Engaging (Does it grab the reader's attention?)
4. Purpose (Does it do what it is written for?)
5. Revision (Clear evidence that the writer worked on it, put in effort.)
So needless to say...this is where my
revelation came in today. My revelation goes a little like this: Rules should be followed, but there
are countless rules. Now, before I go crazy teacher mode, let me explain. I do believe that we need to know "rules" as writers, but we do not necessary have to follow them without allowing our own voice to show. I do think that we need to have "rules" about the grammar in a writing, the organization in a writing, and the content. (I feel like such a stuffy teacher saying those things...but trust me it comes around) So while I was thinking about questions I had following Kendra's wonderful Demo, I asked "How and when do we decide what rules are appropriate to follow when we are writing?" Then I got to thinking, well rules would matter depending on the audience for our writing and the purpose we are writing for. So therefore, would the audience and purpose of the writing not become the most important "rules?" Depending on who we are writing for, and why we are writing...would that not change the way (grammar, syntax, etc.) in which we write? Would it not change who finds it engaging and captivating? Would we not then change the mechanics (maybe no punctuation, maybe no complete sentences)? ***REVELATION*** The rules we follow to create "good writing" depend mainly on who our audience is, and our purpose for writing.
Proof: My Revelation! |
For example: Lyrics are written for listeners of music and for the purpose of allowing listeners to connect to emotions. Plays are written for audiences who enjoy drama and for the purpose of putting on a show and story. Novels are written for audiences interested in various topics (science fiction, fantasy, how-to's...) for a purpose to entertain and have readers enjoy what they are reading. Therefore, today at Day 3 of #UNCCWP, I had the revelation that audience and purpose are the main two "rules" for good writing, and the rest of the rules depend on the first two! Genius...I know ;)
Now, I am off to enjoy my 4th of July holiday weekend. My parents are in town (from Stafford, VA) for our annual Gardner family reunion at Aunt Flo's house. If you're lucky...I'll share some pics ;) Have a great holiday weekend yourself!
First of all....your revelations rock. Second, I agree with the brilliant thinking that you've got down here about the rules of writing. When you take away purpose and audience, none of the other rules seem to hold any weight. And you're right...there are countless rules. Rules for which academic writing is only one of many purposes. I'm liking how when we look at writing from a broader context, the ideas of what makes it good become more complex. Kendra's demo was awesome for getting us thinking along these lines...and I think that it was a great idea to link to her twitter account here. I like how you are making this digital writing space work....you're giving me a ton of ideas.
ReplyDeleteSarah,
ReplyDeleteYour realizations on Friday were much like the ones I had. I think when we include students in our process as assessors, we invite them into understanding how the entire process is jumbled and mixed up. Also, your 4th pictures were great!
-Nick
Hey Sarah! (I'm currently sitting near you so this isn't weird at all...)
ReplyDeleteI was thinking about your response to my blog (which we basically focused on the same thing) and I think...with my students (seniors)...that communicating specific expectations for specific writing assignments would work best. For younger grades it might be cool to create a list of rules/rubric as a class so the students feel very vested in their work. I might even try it with my seniors at some point.
And, lastly, your family reunion looked like it was fun! :)
Hey Sarah! I am so glad that you liked the demonstration and that you got so much from it. I especially liked your ***REVELATION*** "The rules we follow to create "good writing" depend mainly on who our audience is, and our purpose for writing." I just might have to steal that revelation idea for the after-writing with my students. And I think that you are so right about purpose and audience being the larger markers and the "rules" being ancillary--now we just have to wonder why the "rules" are presented to us as the bigger thing.
ReplyDeleteI really love how you broke down the demonstration and what it made you think about. Would you mind if I linked it to my blog under my post for that day?!?